The
Panel found that by redirecting traffic from fordparts.ca to other sites
competitive with Ford creates a clear impression cause confusion, disruption
and hijacking of Complainant’s business. Interestingly, in finding that the
marks were confusingly similar, the Panel embarked upon a section 6(5) Trademarks Act analysis
instead of the typical analysis used by panels, namely, that the domain name
resembled the trademark in appearance, sound or ideas suggested by the
trademark as to be likely mistaken for the trademark.
You can read the decision here.
No comments:
Post a Comment