Thursday, February 9, 2012
CDRP SUMMARY #179 - Ontario Power Authority v. The Urban Environment (Toronto) c.o.b.a. GreenSaver
The Urban Environment (Toronto) c.o.b.a. GreenSaver did not respond to
the Complaint, despite its counsel extending the deadline to file its
response. In May, 2011, The Complainant began promoting a new
low-income conservation and demand management program using the HOME
ASSISTANCE Official Mark and the HOME ASSISTANCE PROGRAM trade-mark. In
August, 2011, the Complainant hosted a live seminar promoting these
services. On August 18, 2011, the Registrant (in attendance at the
seminar) then registered the Domain Name (six days later). The
Registrant’s website was being used for its own commercial gain (in bad
faith), and directing the public that may be eligible for the HOME
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM away from the Complainant and its licensees.
Friday, February 3, 2012
CDRP SUMMARY #178 - Google Inc. v. David Perron
The Complainant (Google Inc.) established its case and the panelist
therefore directed the transfer of googleqc.ca to the Complainant.
David Perron, the Registrant, did not respond to the Complaint. The
Complainant and the Registrant previously entered into an Agreement
whereby the Registrant was granted use of Google’s custom search engine
(amongst other things). In other words, internet users could attend at
the Registrant’s website and perform a Google search with the customized
appearance of tuned search results, and advertisements dedicated to the
Registrant’s website and audience. However, the Registrant registered
a confusingly similar domain name adding “qc” to the end of the GOOGLE
trade-mark and created a website with a similar appearance to
google.com. By adding the word “Quebec", a fleur-de-lys beneath the
stylized Google trade-mark, and some French text on the Registrant’s
website, the arbitrator found that this was intended to mislead internet
users into believing the Registrant’s website was created by Google for
internet users in Quebec.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)