The Greater Toronto Hockey League was founded in 1911 and the Complainant owns the family of GTHL trademarks registered for use in association with youth ice hockey goods and services. The Registrant registered the Domain Name in 2004, operates a pay-per-click website, and did not respond to the Complaint. The Complainant was able to establish common law trademark rights in GTHL prior to the 2004 registration of the Domain Name. Additionally, the Panel found that the Domain Name was registered in bad faith because the Registrant registered sixty other Domain Names including trademarks belonging to other rights holders.
You can read the decision here.
Monday, January 29, 2018
Monday, January 22, 2018
#356 - chick-fil-a.ca - TRANSFER GRANTED
The Complainant is a quick-selling service restaurant in the
chicken segment, and owner of the family of registered Canadian trademarks,
CHICK-FIL-A. The majority of the Complainant’s
restaurants are in the United States however it does operate in Calgary,
Alberta. The Registrant failed to submit a substantive response, but did offer
to transfer the Domain Name to the Complainant.
The Panel found that the Domain Name was registered in bad
faith because the passive holding of a Domain Name prevents the rights holder
from registering its trademark as a Domain Name, and ignoring cease and desist
letters strongly supports a finding of bad faith.
You can read the decision here.
Monday, January 15, 2018
#355 - reginalutheranhome.ca and theedengroupofcompanies.ca - TRANSFER GRANTED
The Complainant, owner of the REGINA LUTHERAN HOME and EDEN
CARE COMMUNITIES, used in Canada as early as 1963 and 2011, respectively. The
Registrant registered the Domain Names in October, 2017. The Complainant alleges that the Domain Name
was set up to disrupt the business of the Complainant and extort money from the
Complainant. The two parties are entrenched
in a vicious dispute that has made its way to the local media and Police. The Registrant is a council member of the
Complainant’s business, and his wife its former chair person. He alleges that the Domain Name was registered
in good faith to criticize the business (including its mismanagement and
finances) of the Complainant. The web
site directs visitors looking for the Complainant to its actual web site (by
hyperlink).
The Panel found that the Domain Name was registered in bad faith. The Panel analyzed whether the web site was registered for the purpose of valid criticism, and held that although some of the material on the web site is criticism, the material as a whole is not. The Registrant appears to be fixated on a vendetta against the Complainant’s former CEO, and the material on the site lacks objectivity, and is therefore not within the meaning of criticism. Additionally, in communication between the parties prior to the registration of the Domain Names, the Registrant did seek compensation (and an apology) from the Complainant and would have abandoned his “project”.
Interestingly, the Registrant sought its costs associated with responding to the Complaint, which was rejected because the Complaint was not brought in bad faith.
You can read the decision here.
Thursday, December 21, 2017
#354 - paylessshoes.ca - TRANSFER GRANTED
The Complainant is a leading retailer of footwear and related accessories and opened its first store in Canada in 1997. It owns a family of trademarks registered in Canada for use in association with shoes or the retail sale of shoes. The Complainant's sales between 2008 and 2011 are in excess of 180 million dollars per year.
The Domain Name was registered in 2008 and is parked as a pay-per-click site. The Panel found that the Domain Name was registered in bad faith because internet users that visit the site may believe there is an affiliation, endorsement or approval by the Complainant.
You can read the decision here.
The Domain Name was registered in 2008 and is parked as a pay-per-click site. The Panel found that the Domain Name was registered in bad faith because internet users that visit the site may believe there is an affiliation, endorsement or approval by the Complainant.
You can read the decision here.
#352 - rheem.ca - TRANSFER GRANTED
The Complainant is reportedly the largest manufacturer of residential
and commercial water heating, cooling, pool/spa heating and refrigeration products in North
America. The Complainant opened its office in Hamilton, Ontario in 1947 and one of the RHEEM registered trademarks claims first use in Canada since 1939. The Complainant uses the rheem.com domain name and visitors in Canada are pointed to canada.rheem.com.
The Domain Name was registered in April, 2017 and was forwarding user's to chauffeeauengros.com a provider of the Complainant's and goods and competitor's goods. The Panel found that the Domain Name was registered in bad faith because, amongst other things, the Registrant ignored cease and desist letters, and is driving traffic away from the Complainant's website.
You can read the decision here.
The Domain Name was registered in April, 2017 and was forwarding user's to chauffeeauengros.com a provider of the Complainant's and goods and competitor's goods. The Panel found that the Domain Name was registered in bad faith because, amongst other things, the Registrant ignored cease and desist letters, and is driving traffic away from the Complainant's website.
You can read the decision here.
#353 - queensuniversity.ca - TRANSFER GRANTED
The Complainant has been using the Queen's University at Kingston Ontario name since at least as early as 1905. Its official mark QUEEN'S was advertised in April 1985. It has used the queensu.ca domain name since 2000. The Domain Name was registered in January, 2003.
The Registrant failed to respond to the Complaint. The Panel found that the Registrant registered the Domain Name in bad faith and inferred that the sole purpose of registering the Domain Name was to bring it to the attention of the Complainant. Additionally, the Registrant is a cyber-squatter and and owns several popular trademarks belonging to other brands.
You can read the decision here.
The Registrant failed to respond to the Complaint. The Panel found that the Registrant registered the Domain Name in bad faith and inferred that the sole purpose of registering the Domain Name was to bring it to the attention of the Complainant. Additionally, the Registrant is a cyber-squatter and and owns several popular trademarks belonging to other brands.
You can read the decision here.
Friday, December 1, 2017
#351 - lurpak.ca - TRANSFER GRANTED
The Complainant owns the LURPAK trademark, registered in Canada since 1994, used since 1957 in association with dairy products. The Registrant registered the Domain Name in 2016, and operates a pay-per-click website featuring links to the Complainant's competitor's products.
The Panel found that the Domain Name was registered in bad faith, as it was offered for sale to the Complainant for $5,999.00 USD. Additionally, the Complainant registered around 220 additional domain names including those incorporating well-known trademarks.
You can read the decision here.
The Panel found that the Domain Name was registered in bad faith, as it was offered for sale to the Complainant for $5,999.00 USD. Additionally, the Complainant registered around 220 additional domain names including those incorporating well-known trademarks.
You can read the decision here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)