The Complainant,
Virox Technologies, Inc., owns the VIROX TECHNOLOGY INC. trademark (registered before
the registration of the Domain Name) and was using the VIROX trademark since
2000, long before the registration of the Domain Name. Nameshield (and
it’s notorious representative, Daniel Mullen) argues that it re-registered the
Domain Name after registering it several years earlier, despite providing no
evidence to that effect. Not surprisingly, the web site was being used as a
pay-per-click site.
The Panel found the
Domain Name was registered in bad faith because the “nominal” ownership of the
Domain Name is in breach of the CIRA Registration Agreement (Nameshield
allegedly was the nominal holder of the Domain Name for Diversey Inc., who
owned a VIROX design trademark that was the subject matter of an expungement
proceeding). Interestingly, the Complainant filed an Affidavit from a
representative of Diversey Inc., disclaiming any claim to the Domain Name and
confirmed that Nameshield is not the nominal holder of the Domain Name (on its
behalf). For that reason, the Panel concluded that Nameshield had no
legitimate interest in the Domain Name, and Daniel Mullen suffered another CDRP
loss.
You can read the decision here.
No comments:
Post a Comment