The
Panel found that the Complainant has rights in the unregistered mark based on a
press release submitted by the Complainant dated July 19, 2012, which showed
use of the ARPE & Design mark and the trade name ARPE-Quebec.
The
Panel found that the Registrant acted in bad faith and had registered the Domain
Name primarily for the purpose of disrupting the business of the Complainant.
The disputed Domain Name resolved to a web site containing accusations against
the Complainant and links to a pornographic website.
However,
the Panel rejected the Complainant’s argument that the Complainant was a
"competitor" of the Registrant in the sense that they were “competing
for online traffic.” The Panel found that such an interpretation would render redundant
the requirement that the Complainant be a competitor of the Registrant since
all web sites compete for traffic.
Nevertheless,
the Panel found that the Complainant met its initial burden of providing some evidence
that the Registrant had no legitimate interest in the Domain Name and since the
Registrant had not filed a reply to the Complaint, the Panel was unable to find
that the Registrant had a legitimate interest in the domain and ordered the
transfer.
You can read the decision here.
No comments:
Post a Comment